|
ISSN: 2360-784X |
International
Journal of Political Science and Development |
|||||||||||||||||
|
International Journal of Political Science and Development Vol. 7(3), pp. 92-100, May, 2019. DOI: 10.14662/IJPSD2019.030 ISSN: 2360-784X
Review
The Principle of Humanitarian Intervention and the "Responsibility to Protect" Between Justice and Prejudice (The Syrian, Somalia, and Kosovo situations)
Etaf Abdel Qader Mohammad Saafin
Al-Shmesani, Amman. Email:etafsafin@gmail.com
Accepted 13 April 2019
The paper aims to investigate the role of UN through its human intervention to solve the national issues to save the human life from genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes practiced by some states against their own citizens. To achieve its aim, the study used the historical and descriptive approach to analyzed at a of three case studies; Syrian crisis, Somalian crisis, and Kosovo’s crisis, in which the states practiced Methods of repression and torture against their peoples to the extent that they needed essential intervention by the international community to stop the criminal massacres. Through the analysis of study it has been concluded that the UN does not apply human intervention principles to all states properly, and it is still affected by some powerful authorities. Finally, the study recommended that UN need to rethink its strategies that can enable human intervention be applied consistently and to all states their population suffer from disasters.
Keywords: Humanitarian Intervention, UN Security Council, Disasters, Syria, Somalia, Kosovo.
Cite this article as:
Etaf Abdel Qader Mohammad Saafin (2019). The Principle of Humanitarian
Intervention and the "Responsibility to Protect" Between Justice and
Prejudice (The Syrian, Somalia, and Kosovo situations). Int. J. Polit.
Sci. Develop. 7(3) 92-100
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
